Lesson 1: Paradigmatic Foundations of Psychological Inquiry (Notes)

​Introduction to Psychological Research

​Psychological research applies the scientific method to ask questions about the world. It gathers empirical evidence (data) to verify theories, which can be quantitative (numbers) or qualitative (words/images).

​The 7 Steps of Research

​Research is not random; it follows a specific cycle :

  1. Selecting the Topic: Choosing a broad area of interest .
  2. Focusing on the Question: Narrowing down to a specific research question and reviewing past literature.
  3. Designing the Study: Planning the method, tools, and techniques for data collection.
  4. Collecting Data: Gathering information scientifically.
  5. Analyzing Data: Manipulating data to find patterns.
  6. Interpreting Data: Finding meaning in the results.
  7. Informing Others: Writing a report to share findings.

Note: These steps are interactive and may not always follow a strict linear order.

Types of Research

​Researchers classify studies based on their purpose and time frame.

FeatureBasic Research Applied Research
GoalAdvance theoretical frameworks and fundamental knowledge.Solve practical, real-world problems.
NatureGuided by strict scientific rules; rigorous.Guided by utility; solutions for immediate use.
Application Long-term; benefits may take decades to appear.Short-term; often used in policy, health, or education.

Types of Applied Research:

  • Evaluation Research: Assesses the effectiveness of a program or policy (e.g., “Did the free lunch program improve attendance?”).
  • Action Research: Participants are actively engaged; focuses on empowerment and fighting oppression/injustice.
  • Social Impact Assessment (SIA): Forecasts the potential future consequences of a planned intervention or policy.

Cross-Sectional vs. Longitudinal Research

  • Cross-Sectional: Compares different groups (e.g., 5-year-olds vs. 8-year-olds) at a single point in time. It is like a snapshot. Disadvantage: Cannot show change over time or causal relationships.
  • Longitudinal: Measures the same individuals on multiple occasions over time . Advantage: Directly tracks individual change and development. Disadvantage: Expensive and time-consuming.

Goals of Psychological Research

​Why do we do research? Usually for three main reasons:

  1. Exploration: To familiarize oneself with a new topic, generate new ideas, and assess feasibility for future studies.
  2. Description: To provide a highly accurate picture of events, verify past data, or classify new data.
  3. Explanation: To test predictions, link issues to general principles, and determine why something happens (cause and effect).

Research Paradigms (The Core Topic)

​A paradigm is a worldview or a set of basic beliefs that guides the researcher. Every paradigm answers three questions:

  1. Ontology: What is the nature of reality?
  2. Epistemology: What is the relationship between the knower (researcher) and the known (knowledge)?
  3. Methodology: How can we find out what we believe in?

​A. Positivism & Post-Positivism

  • View of Reality: Reality consists of “immutable facts” that exist independently of us. It is objective.
  • Goal: To explain behavior using general laws (Nomothetic approach).
  • Key Concepts:
    • Replication: Repeating a study to see if results are the same. If results replicate, it advances scientific knowledge.
    • Deduction: Starting with a general law/theory and testing it in specific cases.
    • Objectivity: The researcher must remain unbiased and detached.
  • Post-Positivism: Challenges the idea of complete objectivity. It argues that a researcher’s background influences observations, so we can only know reality imperfectly. They often use mixed methods (triangulation) to correct for errors.

​B. Interpretive-Constructivist Paradigm

  • View of Reality: Reality is socially constructed. It is based on people’s opinions, beliefs, and perceptions rather than hard facts.
  • Goal: To understand how individuals construct their social world (Idiographic approach, focusing on the specific).
  • Key Concepts:
    • Verstehen: “Empathetic understanding” trying to see the world from the participant’s viewpoint.
    • Voluntarism: People have free will and create meaning.
  • Sub-types:
    • Phenomenology: Focuses on the “lived experience” of humans. How do we make sense of our perceptions?
    • Social Constructivism: Knowledge is constructed through social processes (language, interaction) and is historically/culturally specific.

​C. Critical Approach

  • View of Reality: Combines objective and subjective views. Reality has multiple layers: a surface level of “illusion/myth” and a deeper level of “real” objective reality (often power structures).
  • Goal: To uncover injustice, critique society, and empower weaker people. Research is a moral-political activity.
  • Focus: It aims to peel away the surface illusions to reveal the underlying structures of oppression.

​D. Participatory Research Paradigm

  • Core Belief: Challenges the idea that the researcher is the expert. Ordinary people are recognized as researchers of their own lives.
  • Process: Collaborative. Participants are active partners or “co-researchers” in the study.
  • Goal: Knowledge is for action to improve the lives of the participants and address power inequalities.

Quantitative vs. Qualitative Traditions

Though complementary, they differ in design and logic.

  • Quantitative (Positivist):
    • Logic: Linear path. Starts with a hypothesis \rightarrow Collects Data \rightarrow Tests Hypothesis.
    • Data: “Hard data” (Numbers).
    • Focus: Narrowing down a specific question before starting.
  • Qualitative (Interpretive/Critical):
    • Logic: Non-linear/Cyclical path. A spiral of collecting data \rightarrow analyzing \rightarrow collecting more.
    • Data: “Soft data” (Words, images, symbols).
    • Focus: Questions can be vague initially and narrow down during the study.

Standards of Good Research

​Good research follows the Scientific Method, which assumes:

  • ​Reliance on empirical (observable) evidence.
  • ​Commitment to objective and verifiable deliberations.
  • ​Results are open to criticism and replication.
  • Reflexivity: The researcher actively reflects on how their own beliefs and position influence the research process (common in qualitative research).